Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_May_2


May 2

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Category:Films about Orthodoxy

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Christian media

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: To match parents and subcats, despite the short name of lead article Christian media. – Fayenatic London 11:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Religious films by religion

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: This holds subcats of films about religions, not necessarily religious films. It's a subcat of Films about religion by religion, but "Films about religion(s) by religion" sounds clumsy and unnecessarily wordy.

Category:Evangelical medias

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: "media" is a already a plural noun. Add "Christian" like some within Evangelicalism. Add "mass" like Mass media by religion. Note: Christian media does not currently have "mass" but follows the name of its main article Christian media. – Fayenatic London 11:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anna Maria Jopek songs

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Only one known entry, which is itself a redirect, making this category essentially redundant. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 10:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Critics of Spiritism

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: The two articles Richard Washburn Child and Bartolo Longo only mention Spiritualism, not Spiritism. – Fayenatic London 09:09, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2001 in Norwegian cinema

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: This contains films, which are normally categorised by country and decade, e.g. Category:2000s American films. Cinema categories by year are for festivals, awards etc, e.g. Category:2001 in American cinema. Norwegian decade film categories can immediately be populated with sub-cats for Norwegian-language films, since these are almost exclusively Norwegian. – Fayenatic London 08:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of festivals by continent and city

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer, this is the only subcategory of the target. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Events by region

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: rename and re-parent, with very few exceptions this is all about organized events. After renaming the category can be moved under Category:Organized events by location. SubCategory:The Holocaust by region should be purged after the rename as these are not organized events. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish American state legislators

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: The naming is just a bit confusing on the parent category, because it can be read as American describing the individual or the state. The real problem is in the subcategories, "Jewish American state legislators in Maine", as if some state legislators in Maine might not be American, which seems at least rather unlikely. Those should just be "Jewish state legislators in Maine". Nat Gertler (talk) 00:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tagging all subcategories.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No opinion on the merits. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Telegram channels of Russia

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: To correspond with Category:Russian news websites and similar. – GnocchiFan (talk) 16:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But they are not necessarily “Russian.” Channels in this category are related to Russia, but they do not necessarily have to be Russian (also another case of "of Russia": Category:Mass media companies of Russia). --MocnyDuham (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: 'of Russia' makes it clear it's from the country. 'Russian...' could mean any Russian-language channels. The distinction is subtle, but important. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It has been pointed out that this would entail a change in scope of the category. Should the category be renamed and have its scope changed?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]