Talk:K-pop
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Comeback (K-pop) page were merged into K-pop. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history. |
The contents of the K-pop in Latin America page were merged into K-pop on 28 April 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Addition of images on infobox
[edit]I would like to know why to place images of artists in the infobox about music genre? Who chose which artists would be notable here? There aren't Big Bang, BoA, and others. In addition, what is the point of this type of edition that doesn't bring improvements to the article? In pop music article, we haven't images of Michael Jackson and Madonna on infobox, in rock music article we haven't images of Elvis and Beatles. This is because the articles already mention the notable artists.
Please consider removing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.19.164.94 (talk) 191.19.164.94 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - RPM SP 2022 - MASY1-GC 1260 200 Thu
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 February 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yh3907 (article contribs).
criticism/controversies : lead plus subsections
[edit]I went on to add a criticism section on lead, which was completelly missing. I urge other editors to not remove it, since WP:LEAD clearly states that "The lead should include mention of significant criticism or controversies."
This is of course a first draft, it can be improved in fluidity. I tried to mention all the issues in the most concise way, the etherogenity comes from the fact that the various issues need a rewrite on the subsection as well. First of all I think that the controversies should follow some kind of logical order, which can be something like "from first to last" "from lightest to harsher".
This is the current order:
Corruption Poor living and working conditions Tight control over public image Sexualization and pressure on appearance Mental health Criticism of hybrid identity
I want to change it to something like this. I think that it improves an understanding of how the issues develops.
Criticism of hybrid identity Poor living and working conditions Corruption Sexualization and pressure on appearance Tight control over public image Mental health
I am also wondering if it is not better to rephrase some of the titles, to make them broader or more specific when needed. Should a title of a criticism section already have the criticism on it? For exemple "poor" on living and working conditions. I don't know. Also I would change "Mental health" to "Suicides", it seems way more appropriate and specific to the Korean/K-pop world, well described by so many sources. Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 14:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would put "Corruption" second, followed by working conditions and public image, before going into sexualization and mental health. Support removing "criticism of", "poor", and "tight" from their respective titles. Vacosea (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Great, I'll try to do it now. A bigger expansion and rewrite will need more time. I also think that the sexualization part and a more general appearance/beauty section should be separated, two different issues that often get different sources, even more than mental health and suicides.
- Also thank you for the rewrite of the paragraph I added on lead, it's good. Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 15:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done, it will be way easier and more sensical to proceede with some other quality edits now in my opinion. The whole section alredy flows better. Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Evening everyone The changes needed to be done is to add Amapinao into the category space as part of what genre kpop also associate with. This is because more and more kpop idols are now making more Afro-beat related songs. E.g. Le Sserafim released a song 'Smart' on the 5th of March, 2024. As well as more genres needed to be added Nontombie (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would personally condense/remove references to other genres in the lead, I see no point in linking to more than 10 genres. Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 14:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 01:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Online Communities
[edit]This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2025 and 15 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Taylorsydney (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Taylorsydney (talk) 02:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Arts
- B-Class vital articles in Arts
- B-Class Korea-related articles
- Top-importance Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea popular culture working group
- Unstable Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea articles
- B-Class music genre articles
- Music genres task force articles
- B-Class Pop music articles
- Mid-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- B-Class Regional and national music articles
- Low-importance Regional and national music articles